For a slightly more detailed description of Geoffrey Scott's six fallacies of architecture (with the addition of his own fallacy) click here. I'm still developing my understanding of the fallacies and these examples. I am not sure about a couple of them, most notably the empathy fallacy, and the Porphyrios gallery in Nebraska (you have to admit the building is gorgeous).
Modern Example:
Villa Savoye, Le Corbusier. It represents its own age as an association with a machine itself.
Traditional Example:
The Duncan Gallery, Dmitri Porphyros. The New Schinkel – Germany’s version of Greek Revival. He makes good architecture through allusion to very specific precedents. This architecture can be considered good on the grounds that it is beautifully constructed, is a villa in the country, and because we associate it with Greek architecture, or Greek Revival architecture, also on other very good grounds. Does Porphyrios really believe classism is not a style? He might also be placed under the mechanical fallacy. Or it could be argued that because Schinkel really was great Porphyrios can get away with imitating him, especially since he does it so well.
Romantic Fallacy (Naturalism and Picturesque)
Modernist Example:
(Naturalism) Einstein Tower, Potsdam, Erich Menelsohn. Uses natural curves and shapes.
Traditional Example: (Picturesque)
New Piazza in Alessandria, Italy, Leon Krier. Expressionist and associative, very picturesque. Trying to make it look old and built up over time. Eclectic.
Mechanical Fallacy
Modernist Example:
860–880 Lake Shore Drive, Meis van der Rohe. They represent their structure.
Traditional Example:
Design for a Concert Hall, Viollet le Duc. Most current traditionalists get this fallacy, except for early traditionalists, Aldo Rossi? Traditional forms but allowing them to be machine like----postmodernism.
Ethical Fallacy
Modernist Example:
Unite d’Habitation, Corbu. This was supposed to make moral citizens.
Traditional Example:
Zeppelinhaupttribüne, Albert Spier
Biological Fallacy
Modernist Example:
?
This shouldn't be hard, just use your imagination, maybe the "Cloud Pavilion" in Zurich.
This shouldn't be hard, just use your imagination, maybe the "Cloud Pavilion" in Zurich.
Traditional Example:
West Dean Visitor Center, Christopher Alexander. A windowsill at the wrong height makes you sick. Scientifically grounding traditional architecture.
Academic Tradition
Modern Example:
Guggenheim Museum, Bilbao Frank Gehry. No theory, no tradition.
Traditional Example:
St. Thomas Aquinas Chapel, Duncan Stroik. Cut and past Palladio w/Spanish Colonial?
(7) Empathy Fallacy
Heurtley House, Frank Lloyd Wright













The building is approached from the North by its least eloquent side and at the top – the wrong way round as it were. In the words of the modernists "the imposing wall of the church suddenly rises up against the sunlight, recalling (alluding to?) images of ancient walled abbeys."
From here we gain a view of the interior of the “cloister" and the cell block’s interior with its many windows. Indeed, the structure is imposing with its brutal concrete seeming to the viewer like a bunker or massive bridge pier.
The building is constructed almost entirely of reinforced concrete, used both structurally, and as venire structure supported from large “pilotis” as Le Corbusier called them, or central columns which raised the building off the ground and freed the walls of the façade for long strip windows. These pilotis unlock glimpses of the "central void" containing the enclosed cloister whose form bears none of the features of traditional cloisters; instead, one follows an internal “promenade intricately interwoven with diverse components contrasting sharply with the underlying simplicity of the plan."
What makes this a good example of the use of concrete is that it uses concrete as a finish material. Nowhere in this structure is there a use of a finish material or coating for the concrete that is the structure. From the “pilotis” that support the building to the walls and even windows, concrete is used in its raw unfinished form.
The concrete is used right up to the details, formed up even to hold the paines of glass to be found in most of the windows.
Overall, the use of concrete in this building is not so amazing simply in its structural qualities. The “pilotis” system had been used many times by Le Corbusier. Rather, it was its combination of structure and aesthetics into a single unmasked entity: the building itself. The very austerity and starkness of the building was seen as beautiful and appropriate to its function as a place of self denial and meditation. 